Short notes on Current Affairs 18.12.2025

SHANTI Bill, 2025

Overview of the Bill

  • The Sustainable Harnessing and Advancement of Nuclear Energy for Transforming India (SHANTI) Bill, 2025 was passed by the Lok Sabha.
  • The Bill aims to open India’s nuclear power sector to private participation, including foreign companies.
  • Despite Opposition demands, the Bill was not referred to a parliamentary standing committee.
  • The Bill now moves to the Rajya Sabha for consideration.

Government’s Objectives

  • Increase nuclear power capacity as part of India’s clean energy transition.
  • Support India’s 2070 net-zero emissions target.
  • Reduce reliance on fossil fuels and improve grid stability.
  • Encourage private investment to accelerate nuclear expansion.
  • Scale nuclear capacity from 8.8 GW currently to 100 GW by 2047.
  • Support new technologies such as:
    • Small Modular Reactors (SMRs)
    • 220 MW Pressurised Heavy Water Reactors (Bharat SMRs)
  • Backed by a ₹20,000-crore Nuclear Mission announced in the Union Budget.

Key Legal Change: Nuclear Liability Framework

  • The Bill removes a crucial clause from the Civil Liability for Nuclear Damage Act, 2010:
    • Earlier, nuclear plant operators could seek recourse from suppliers if faulty equipment caused an accident.
  • This clause was originally introduced to:
    • Protect Indian public interest
    • Address safety concerns post-Bhopal gas tragedy
  • Its removal is aimed at:
    • Addressing foreign suppliers’ concerns over unlimited liability
    • Making India’s nuclear sector more attractive to global players

Historical Context

  • In 2008, the BJP opposed the UPA government’s nuclear policy, citing the absence of supplier liability.
  • Ironically, the same clause later became a deterrent to foreign participation, even after:
    • The India–U.S. Civil Nuclear Deal
    • India’s waiver from Nuclear Suppliers Group (NSG) restrictions
  • The government argues that technological advancements have changed the risk landscape since 2010.

Government’s Justification

  • According to Science Minister Jitendra Singh:
    • Reactor technology has evolved, especially with SMRs, which are:
      • Smaller
      • Designed for dense population areas
      • Associated with lower catastrophic risk
    • A graded liability regime is necessary to:
      • Encourage innovation
      • Attract private capital
      • Make SMR projects financially viable
  • Operator liability remains capped at ₹3,000 crore, but:
    • Additional compensation can come from:
      • A nuclear insurance pool
      • A proposed Nuclear Liability Fund, financed through tariffs

Opposition’s Major Criticisms

  • Public safety and accountability:
    • Opposition leaders argued that removing supplier liability weakens accountability.
    • Questioned why foreign suppliers should be shielded in case of accidents.
  • Liability cap concerns:
    • ₹3,000 crore cap seen as:
      • Arbitrary
      • Inadequate
      • Unchanged since 2010 despite inflation
  • Global disaster comparisons:
    • Fukushima clean-up: ~$182 billion
    • Chernobyl impact: ~$700 billion
    • Indian cap: ~₹3,000 crore (~$400 million)
  • Demand for scrutiny:
    • Several MPs demanded referral to a parliamentary committee for deeper examination.

Current State of India’s Nuclear Sector

  • Nuclear power contributes:
    • ~1.5% of installed capacity
    • ~3% of electricity generation
  • Remains a strategic and highly regulated sector, traditionally dominated by the public sector.

Broader Implications

  • Represents a major shift in India’s nuclear governance framework.
  • Seeks to balance:
    • Energy security
    • Climate goals
    • Investment attractiveness
  • Raises unresolved questions about:
    • Long-term safety
    • Public liability
    • Fair risk-sharing between operators, suppliers, and the state
  • Success depends on:
    • Strong regulatory oversight
    • Transparent safety standards
    • Effective compensation mechanisms in worst-case scenarios

Commissioning of INAS 335 (Ospreys)

Key Event

  • INAS 335 (Ospreys), the second Indian Naval Air Squadron to operate MH-60R Seahawk helicopters, was commissioned at INS Hansa, Goa.
  • The ceremony was presided over by Admiral Dinesh K. Tripathi, Chief of the Naval Staff (CNS).

Significance of the Commissioning

  • Marks a major milestone in the modernisation of Indian naval aviation, particularly rotary-wing capabilities.
  • Establishes the first operational MH-60R squadron on the western seaboard, strengthening maritime security in the Arabian Sea and western Indian Ocean.
  • Follows the commissioning of the first MH-60R squadron at Kochi in March 2024, indicating phased induction.

Capabilities of MH-60R Helicopters

  • MH-60R is a multi-role, advanced maritime helicopter.
  • Enhances:
    • Anti-Submarine Warfare (ASW)
    • Anti-Surface Warfare (ASuW)
    • Surveillance and reconnaissance
    • Search and rescue operations
  • Significantly boosts the Navy’s rotary-wing combat, detection, and response capabilities.

Strategic Importance of INS Hansa

  • INS Hansa, located in Goa, is a critical naval air station on the western coast.
  • Previously hosted major capability upgrades, including:
    • Commissioning of the second P-8I maritime patrol aircraft squadron in 2022
  • Acts as a hub for long-range maritime surveillance and air operations.

Broader Naval Aviation Modernisation

  • MH-60R helicopters complement:
    • P-8I long-range maritime patrol aircraft (for wide-area surveillance and submarine tracking)
    • Upcoming MQ-9B Sea Guardian remotely piloted aircraft (RPAs), with 15 units under acquisition
  • Together, these platforms enable:
    • Network-centric warfare
    • Persistent maritime domain awareness
    • Enhanced deterrence and rapid response

Historical Context

  • The commissioning holds symbolic importance as 2025 marks 75 years since the Government of India approved the formation of the Fleet Air Arm.
  • Highlights the evolution of Indian naval aviation from its inception to a technology-intensive force multiplier.

Overall Assessment

  • The commissioning of INAS 335 reflects India’s focus on:
    • Maritime security
    • Indigenisation and modernisation
    • Strengthening presence in the Indian Ocean Region (IOR)
  • It reinforces India’s ability to address:
    • Submarine threats
    • Surface combat challenges
    • Surveillance gaps along key sea lanes
  • Represents a critical step toward a capability-driven, multi-layered maritime defence architecture.

DESERT CYCLONE–II

  • The Indian Army has dispatched a contingent to the United Arab Emirates (UAE) to participate in the second edition of the India–UAE Joint Military Exercise, DESERT CYCLONE–II.
  • The joint exercise is scheduled to take place in Abu Dhabi from December 18 to December 30.
  • The Indian contingent consists of 45 personnel, mainly drawn from a Mechanised Infantry Regiment battalion, highlighting India’s focus on mechanised warfare capabilities.
  • The UAE Land Forces are represented by an equally sized contingent, drawn from the 53 Mechanised Infantry Battalion, ensuring parity and balanced participation.
  • DESERT CYCLONE–II is designed as a bilateral military engagement, reflecting the growing strategic and defence partnership between India and the UAE.
  • The primary objective of the exercise is to enhance interoperability, enabling both armies to operate more effectively together in joint operational scenarios.
  • The exercise also aims to strengthen defence cooperation, including the exchange of tactical knowledge, operational procedures, and best practices in mechanised infantry operations.
  • Conducting the exercise in a desert environment provides realistic training conditions relevant to regional security challenges.
  • The exercise underscores India’s expanding defence diplomacy and its commitment to deeper military collaboration with key partners in West Asia.
  • Overall, DESERT CYCLONE–II reinforces mutual trust, operational synergy, and long-term military cooperation between the Indian Army and the UAE Land Forces.

Indian Coast Guard (ICG) Ship Sarthak

  • The Indian Coast Guard (ICG) Ship Sarthak, an offshore patrol vessel, entered Chabahar Port in Iran on December 16 for a four-day visit lasting until December 19.
  • This visit marks the first-ever port call by an Indian Coast Guard ship to Chabahar, making it a significant milestone in India–Iran maritime engagement.
  • According to the Defence Ministry, the port call highlights India’s expanding maritime presence and strategic outreach in the region.
  • The visit underscores India’s capability and commitment to supporting secure sea lines of communication, particularly for Afghanistan and Central Asia, regions that rely on Chabahar for trade access.
  • Chabahar Port is strategically important as it provides India with alternative connectivity bypassing Pakistan, strengthening regional trade and logistics.
  • The visit aligns with India’s maritime vision frameworks of SAGAR (Security and Growth for All in the Region) and MAHASAGAR, which emphasize secure, inclusive, and cooperative maritime engagements.
  • ICG Ship Sarthak is scheduled to participate in a range of professional interactions, likely including maritime cooperation, best-practice exchanges, and capacity-building activities.
  • The ship will also engage in community-oriented activities, reflecting India’s emphasis on maritime diplomacy and people-to-people outreach.
  • Overall, the port call reinforces India’s role as a net security provider in the Indian Ocean Region (IOR) and strengthens strategic maritime partnerships in West Asia and beyond.

Uniform Definition of the Aravalli Hills and Ranges

Background & Supreme Court Intervention

  • In November 2025, the Supreme Court (SC) issued an order to:
    • Set a uniform definition of the Aravalli hills and ranges.
    • Pause granting new mining leases within the Aravalli areas across Delhi, Haryana, Rajasthan, and Gujarat.
  • This follows decades of over-exploitation of the Aravalli range and previous legal interventions, including a 2009 SC ban on mining in select Haryana districts.

Significance of the Aravalli Range

  • Age & Geography: Nearly 2 billion years old, India’s oldest mountain range, stretching 650 km from Delhi to Gujarat.
  • Ecological Role:
    • Prevents desertification of the Indo-Gangetic plains.
    • Arrests the eastward spread of the Thar Desert into Haryana, Rajasthan, and western Uttar Pradesh.
    • Stabilizes climate, biodiversity, and groundwater recharge.
  • Hydrological Importance: Source of rivers such as Chambal, Sabarmati, and Luni; supports critical water-recharge systems.
  • Mineral Wealth: Sandstone, limestone, marble, granite, and metals like lead, zinc, copper, gold, tungsten.
  • Environmental Concerns:
    • Excessive quarrying over the past four decades has deteriorated air quality and groundwater recharge.
    • Illegal mining remains an ongoing issue.
  • International Commitments: India is bound by the UN Convention to Combat Desertification to protect ecosystems like the Aravallis.

Past Actions Against Mining

  • Environment Ministry: Rules since the early 1990s restricted mining to sanctioned projects, but violations persisted.
  • 2009 SC Ban: Imposed in Faridabad, Gurugram, and Mewat (Haryana).
  • May 2024 SC Directive:
    • Prohibited new leases and renewals.
    • Directed the Central Empowered Committee (CEC) to examine the range and recommend measures.
  • CEC Recommendations (March 2024):
    • Complete scientific mapping of the Aravalli range.
    • Macro-level environmental impact assessments for mining.
    • Ban mining in ecologically sensitive areas (protected habitats, water bodies, tiger corridors, aquifer recharge zones, NCR).
    • Regulate stone-crushing units.
    • No new leases until proper mapping and impact assessments are done.
  • June 2025 ‘Green Wall’ Project:
    • Expand green cover in a 5-km buffer zone across 29 districts of Gujarat, Rajasthan, Haryana, Delhi.
    • Aim: Restore 26 million hectares of degraded land by 2030.

Need for a Uniform Definition

  • States and expert groups used inconsistent criteria to define Aravalli hills and ranges.
  • Forest Survey of India (FSI, 2010) criteria: Based on slope (>3°), foothill buffer (100m), inter-hill distance (500m), and enclosed area.
  • SC Committee (2025) Decision:
    • Only hills above 100 metres are considered part of the Aravalli range.
    • Objection: Too narrow, may allow mining on smaller hills, breaking the continuity of the range.
    • Counterpoint: Prior slope-based definitions excluded even large areas; 100m threshold is more inclusive.

SC’s Other Directions

  • Prepare a Management Plan for Sustainable Mining (MPSM) covering the entire range:
    • Identify areas of absolute mining prohibition.
    • Map zones for limited, regulated mining.
    • Map sensitive habitats and wildlife corridors.
    • Evaluate cumulative ecological impacts and ecological carrying capacity.
    • Articulate restoration and rehabilitation measures.

Reason for No Total Ban

  • Total bans often trigger:
    • Illegal mining syndicates.
    • Violent sand mafias.
    • Unregulated extraction.
  • SC opted for a calibrated approach:
    • Existing legal mining continues under tight regulation.
    • New mining paused until scientific plan is ready.
    • Permanently sensitive areas remain off-limits.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top