MCQs Based On Political Science- (234)

Q1. Which of the following Fundamental Rights is available against private individuals as well as the State?

  1. Article 19
  2. Article 17
  3. Article 23
  4. Article 21

Correct Option: 3. Article 23.
Explanation: In general, Fundamental Rights in India are enforceable against the State, meaning the government and its authorities must not violate these rights. This is known as a vertical relationship — between the individual and the State.
However, some Fundamental Rights are also enforceable against private individuals, which creates a horizontal relationship — between private persons. These are exceptions to the general rule.
Key Features of Article 23:
1. Applies to both State and private individuals:
-Even if a private person forces another person into labour (without payment or against their will), it is a violation of Article 23.
-The State has a duty to prohibit and penalize such acts, but even in the absence of State involvement, private violations are punishable.
2. Covers human trafficking:
-Selling or buying of human beings for immoral or exploitative purposes (like prostitution or slavery) is explicitly prohibited.
-This applies to both government officials and private individuals or syndicates.
3. Includes ‘begar’:
-Begar is a system where a person is forced to work without payment. This system was historically common in colonial and feudal India.
-Article 23 outlaws this irrespective of who imposes it — government, landlord, contractor, etc.
4. Does not require State action to be violated:
-For most Fundamental Rights (e.g., Article 19 — freedom of speech), the violation must come from the State. -In contrast, Article 23 can be violated by any person, so its scope is broader and directly applicable to private misconduct. Judicial Support:
In People’s Union for Democratic Rights v. Union of India (1982), the Supreme Court held:
-“Even private individuals, who force labor without payment or under coercion, violate Article 23. The State has a constitutional obligation to take action against such violations.”
-This case involved construction workers employed under exploitative conditions by private
contractors.
Conclusion:
-Article 23 is distinct because it protects individuals not just from the State, but also from other private individuals or entities.
-It plays a crucial role in protecting vulnerable sections of society (like migrant laborers, bonded workers, victims of trafficking).
-That’s why Article 23 is rightly called a horizontally enforceable right, and is an exception to the general verticality of Fundamental Rights.


Q2. Which Article prohibits the State from making any law that curtails Fundamental Rights?

  1. Article 35
  2. Article 13(2)
  3. Article 36
  4. Article 31C

Correct Option: 2. Article 13(2).
Explanation: Article 13(2) mandates that the State shall not make any law that takes away or abridges the Fundamental Rights, making such laws void ab initio.


Q3. The doctrine of ‘basic structure’ limits the power of:

  1. Supreme Court
  2. High Court
  3. Parliament
  4. President

Correct Option: 3. Parliament.
Explanation: The Basic Structure Doctrine, established in Kesavananda Bharati, restricts Parliament’s power to amend the Constitution under Article 368, ensuring it does not damage core principles like Fundamental Rights.


Q4. Which one of the following is NOT a ground for restricting Article 19(1)(a) – Freedom of Speech and Expression?

  1. Decency and morality
  2. Public order
  3. Friendly relations with foreign states
  4. Economic development

Correct Option: 4. Economic development.
Explanation: Article 19(2) allows reasonable restrictions on freedom of speech for reasons like public order, decency, morality, etc., but not for economic development.


Q5. Which of the following is a negative Fundamental Right?

  1. Article 21 – Right to life
  2. Article 15 – Prohibition of discrimination
  3. Article 16 – Equality in employment
  4. Article 19 – Freedom of expression

Correct Option: 2. Article 15 – Prohibition of discrimination.
Explanation: A negative right imposes a restriction on the State’s action. Article 15 prohibits the State from discriminating, making it a classic example of a negative obligation.


Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top